Sunday, November 21, 2010

My Review of evolv Knit Chalk Bag - Striped

Originally submitted at REI

The attractive design of the evolv knit chalk bag adds some color to your look while climbing at the crag and the gym.


i thourghly enjoy my bag

By funsize from Bend, OR/ Sacramento, CA on 11/21/2010

 

4out of 5

Pros: Stylish, Adequate Capacity, Lightweight

Cons: Bag is too deep

Best Uses: Bouldering, Climbing Gyms, Outdoors, Top Roping

Describe Yourself: Casual/ Recreational

Was this a gift?: No

i love my bag.. i haven't had any major problems with it other than the clip to keep the string tight is a bit fusy. the bag is a bit deep for small hands and sometimes is hard to get my hand chalked in a hury

thumbnail

Tags: Using Product

(legalese)

Thursday, September 23, 2010

09.22.10- Whassup vs. Whassup 2008

I feel like I lost brain cells for watching the original Whassup commercial. I do not see the connection between the commercial and the product they are trying to sell: coca cola. Although the Whassup 2008 commercial was quite funny in comparison to what was going on in the USA in 2008. Even though I hadn’t seen the 2008 commercial before- apparently it was pretty popular for the Obama campaign- it didn’t make me feel like an idiot after watching it.
I dislike free writing…. It keep my thoughts short and to the point… at least there isn’t a word count minimum like my last class….
Whassup- stupid, immature, irrelevant, pointless, annoying, waste of time
Whassup 2008- ironic, purposeful, relevant to the times problems,
A commercial is supposed to give enough information in a 30-second window to persuade you to agree with what they are trying to advocate, sell, or promote. I felt the connection more with Whassup 2008 rather than the original Whassup. Maybe because Whassup 2008 was mimicking the stupidity of the original Whassup commercial that made it more pleasing to watch yet threw in a positive outcome that many persons wanted during the 2008 elections. It brought humor to topics that were depressing, heated, and relevant.

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

The Sound of Love: Others & Myself



(writen in the Spring of 2009)

Reaction Paper
The Sounds of Love: Others and Myself

About 3 years I moved to Long Beach, CA to escape from where I was brought up, in hopes of experiencing anything new, anything that would open up new possibilities to my world (Private Christian School) that felt so small, so censored as to what was taught to me about life; I knew that there were things out there that I wanted to know and that I was certainly capable of handling. As soon as I arrived I wrote “Home Sweet Home”:

'Home Sweet Home'
I am home but not home sweet home.
This is where I belong, yet not where I will end.
I am this way because of people who have exited my life, although this is not my complete story.
This air has rejuvenated me yet has not rescued me. Maybe it will one day.
but for now I must keep myself sane for a better day.
I’m not sure where I will end my journey, yet I know it will be with someone truly amazing.
Amazing enough that they are indescribable.
So for now this is my story. Read it but don't judge a book by its cover.
Read every last word. Close your eyes and make sure you leave a mark.

I went down there on terms with my parents that I went to school. So, I signed up for my first philosophy class, not knowing quite what the concept of the class was and by only reading the two sentence description in the class catalog all the while trying to find something that would keep me interested long enough to actually finish a class to get credits towards my AA degree, I signed up for an Existentialism class at LBCC. I don’t know how else to describe that experience other than for me it was like being a little kid in elementary school watching all the high school kids, and imaging what will be like when I am that age. You stare and think and come up with ideas, all the while having being told their experiences of day-to-day life and being completely star-struck yet absolutely incapable of understanding what they are talking about. As for the existentialism class, I was capable of sitting in class and going over all the many great philosophers and yet not being able to grasp what they meant; yet it was like a drug, I was also incapable of shutting it out, of ignoring what I was hearing even though I wasn’t yet capable of their concepts of life, love, friendship, conscience, and definitions of god.
All the while this was taking place in my life, I like any other 19 year old girl I developed quite a liking for this guy two years older than I, and to sum up my experience of his place in my life I wrote “Moment Between”:
“Moment Between”
Nervous thoughts with uncontrollable heartbeats.
Unsure movements while playing the games.
Off guard, but impressing actions.
Censured decisions, for future hopes.
Steps of courage, or risk full jumps.
Unsure self-esteem, yet confident wall.
Exciting presence filled with moments of vulnerability.
Remembrance of passing days, my walls reinforced.
Girlish confusion, comfort produced.
The Guru emanates courage resurrected.
Day to day heart beats, thoughts run, uncommon actions, courage recharged.
All for that one moment.

After all the games, and flirting, I was left to be alone to question yet again why I had not found love, to question what had not worked between us, to question everything. So, I turned to music because that seems to be the only thing that keeps me from reverting back to a depressive state.

In music I find it extremely hard to listen to the lyrics of songs, probably because I have enough thoughts and questions going on in my head and I do not want or need anyone else’s words making clutter due to the fact that most of the songs now a days are useless sentences stung together to make money instead of helping a person to achieve a state of themselves they never new possible. I have found, of course not on my own because every disciple needs a mater teacher, that if you listen and meditate on the beats and rhythms of the songs, or songs entirely without lyrics, they are so much more meaningful on a spiritual level because it is a way of listening to the world that has been long forgotten. “It is a way of getting in touch with something stronger and more powerful than who you are in this world” (Coelho: The Witch of Portobello).
Recently one song in particular was capable of putting a rhythm, that allowed me to relax my body from the pain of my heart of my most recent love which took me two years to allow myself to be that vulnerable again; and lyrics that allowed me to focus my thoughts inward and regain myself:

Kings of Leon
“Use Somebody”

I've been roaming around
always looking down at all I see
painted faces fill the places I can't reach

you know that I could use somebody
you know that I could use somebody
someone like you

and all you know
and how you speak
countless lovers undercover of the street

you know that I could use somebody
you know that I could use somebody
someone like you

off in the night,
while you live it up, I’m off to sleep
waging war to shake the poet and the beat

I hope it's gonna make you notice
I hope it's gonna make you notice
someone like me
someone like me
someone like me

go and let it out
someone like you
somebody
someone like you
somebody
someone like you
somebody

I’ve been roaming around
always looking down at all I see

For me the meaning of this song is to use somebody in a way not to humiliate them or bring them down but to use “who they are” as a person to better yourself, to learn or become conscious of yourself, become conscious of what path to choose when things of good or of bad happen to you.
I first heard the idea of becoming conscious from “Existentialism” by R.C. Solomon regarding Nietzsche: what does your conscience say? “You should become the person you are”. By becoming who you are, you already have to be somebody, you will have to question and let things go to embrace whom you are and not let yourself be stagnant.
Taking from the text of Coelho’s book Brida regarding learning from someone else’s personal story: “An anonymous text from the Tradition (Tradition of the Moon), says that each person can take one of two attitudes: to build or to plant. The builders might take years over their tasks, but one day, they finish what they’re doing. Then they find they’re hemmed in by their own walls. Life loses its meaning when the building stops. Then there are those who plant. They endure storms and all the many vicissitudes of the seasons, and they rarely rest. But, unlike a building, a garden never stops growing. And while it requires the gardener’s constant attention, it also allows life for the gardener to be a great adventure. Gardeners always recognize one another, because they know that in the history of each plant lies the growth of the whole world”.
It is only I who can choose whether or not I let myself become who I already am, who I used to be but has forgotten, to become everything that I am capable of that allows me to live my life to the fullest potential.

I have only recently become accustomed to this concept in the past year, and being able to apply it to my life now. I have always wanted to know why things happen the way they do, why things happen to me to cause such heart ache, why I can’t find someone with whom might know the answers or at the very least know where to look for such answers to all my many questions. I have only become aware to look for all the possible roads that may guide me towards my path, my Personal Legend, the “meaning of my life”; roads that will keep me conscious of who I already am, roads that will show me that I can live fulfilled even if I never get a reason why things happen the way they happen.

From Coelho’s book Brida “Will we ever know the ultimate reasons for our existence?” “Only the brave and those who understand the Traditions of the Sun and the Moon are aware that the only possible answers to the ultimate question is I DON’T KNOW”.
I can start to rationalize the possibility of actually never finding answers to ALL of my questions. The questions that I still have not found answers to all tend to relate to love. All kinds of love. From philos, where your best friend, the one person in your life that could not possibly fathom doing you any wrong, that is always by your side, never judging, always there to help you pick yourself back up. Yet if that unconditional friend completely breaks trust, and it sends you into a state of turmoil, spinning round and round and round, where all you want is for someone to stop it, to tell you why this incomprehensible thing just shook your world; where do you find it in yourself to remember that they are just as imperfect as you are, they are going through war within themselves just at I am. Yet I do find something inside myself that allows me to remember the good in that person over weighs the bad. Most people call that thing “time”. I only call it time because I have not yet found what it is that I already know. What is it, that when I look deep down inside myself, I find answers? Where are these things coming from? Did I already know these answers and I just forgot them?
To Eros, the kind of love that is completely unconditional. Not the kind that you are told about in fairytales that tells you how a prince will come and rescue you from the big bad evil that is keeping you captive in that tower, but the kind of love the consumes your thoughts, makes your heart warm, makes your stomach drop and your head spin, the kind of love that makes you want to be around that person every possible moment, where you even miss them when you loose sight of them for a moment, the kind of love that makes you feel the worst possible low and yet all at the same moment in time brings you to a high you can barely explain to anyone let alone yourself.

Blue foundation
“Eyes on fire”

I'll seek you out,
Flay you alive
One more word and you won't survive
And I'm not scared of your stolen power
I see right through you any hour

I won't soothe your pain
I won't ease your strain
You'll be waiting in vain
I got nothing for you to gain

I'm taking it slow
Feeding my flame
Shuffling the cards of your game
And just in time
In the right place
Suddenly I will play my ace

I won't soothe your pain
I won't ease your strain
You'll be waiting in vain
I got nothing for you to gain

Eyes on fire
Your spine is ablaze
Felling any foe with my gaze

And just in time
In the right place
Steadily emerging with grace

Felling any foe with my gaze
Steadily emerging with grace
Felling any foe with my gaze
Steadily emerging with grace

MOTION CITY SOUNDTRACK LYRICS
"It Had To Be you”
I'll get lost, messed up and bored when I'm alone too long
I can't sleep, function or eat when I'm not with someone
Late last fall, she ended it all and moved to who-knows-where
Just like that, she vanished and packed and never even called

Do you feel a certain sense of synergy between yourself and me?
A kind of macabre and somber Wondertwin type of harmony
What if it was you?
You that I needed all along
I felt like a fool,
Kicking and screaming and pretending we were wrong

Let's get wrecked on pop tarts and sex and see the Taj Mahal
Let's save birds from Prince William Sound and skateboard through the mall
Let's fight crime with mangoes and limes and join the PGA
Let's win big with every spin but hurry, I can't wait

Do you spend a fortune on those late night prepaid television scams
In search of the perfect blender, steak knife and non-stick frying pan?
What if it was you?
You that I needed all along
I felt like a fool
Thinking we were completely wrong
It seemed like a dream
A beautiful scream
That echoed forever
And made us not afraid to feel a thing

And after it ends
We'll try to be friends
They say that what doesn't kill us makes us who we are

All this time and everything's changed but I still feel the same
All good things eventually end and get washed down the drain
What a disaster it would be if you discovered that I cared
A little too much for friends but not enough to share

What if it was you?
You that I needed all along
I felt like a fool
Now that I'm sure that I was wrong
It had to be you.
It had to be you.
It had to be you.
I knew it was you.

So I do not know who I am. I do not know what the meaning of my life is, nor do I know the answers to the questions of my life. What I do know is that I am starting to become capable of finding the path or paths that I need to follow in order to allow myself to live with questions that I will never know answers to. I know I will be at a constant battle within myself to become the very best of who I am meant to be. There are reasons why I am a person who cannot stand to be alone in a room, yet when I am around people I do not what to be the center of attention; why I constantly put my lover, friends, or family wants or needs before my own. Even though I strongly believe, and constantly forget, that you have to love who you are before anyone else can love who you are, thus the tattoo on my wrist of “123”: it is not wrong to be selfish sometimes because if you are the last person on earth and you don’t love who you are then what is the point of your life. Why I would much rather play a sport that deals with team cooperation than with a sport that involves just my abilities and myself.

The best way to summarize how philosophy can produce my personal happiness is by explaining my analogy of the sandbox.
People (Christians) live in this world called the sandbox. They know nothing other than the rules of how to play inside the sandbox. I was born inside this sandbox along with my father while my mother was born outside. Something deep down inside of myself was telling me to go play on the edges of the sandbox; you could describe it as not fitting in with the other kids and having them throw sand at you or not letting you play with certain toys. I slowly found myself closer and closer to the edge. I started to see things and hear of things that I could not comprehend. I realized there was this amazing would outside of this sandbox.
Once you are outside this sandbox you are free to come and go as you please. You cannot bring anything inside the box as proof of this outside world, but you can show the people inside that there are doors that lead to this world if they so choose to go through them. I chose to go explore these doors. I have been able to see over the walls of the sandbox and learn about this world. A world that allows me to analyze who I am, a world that can teach me things beyond the views of the Christian religion, a world that will not always judge me for thinking differently. I have found that philosophy had prepared me to be capable of opening these doors that lead outside, yet I remain living inside the sandbox. I know that I am close to finding the courage to step through the door and leave the sandbox but not today. I feel I am so close to becoming something that will put part of my soul at ease, even for a short time.
Will I like this world once I step through the door? I do not have that answer. Will I want to come back into the sandbox and play again with the kids I grew up with? Most likely, due to the fact I know I am only where I am today because of some of the people who still and will always live inside the sandbox. Will I find a man to accompany me along my many adventures, that will encourage me to keep becoming the women I already am, that will love me no matter where we are on the earth? Yes, because everyone has a soul mate, everyone eventually meets him or her; yet it is up to me to realize that moment and not let it pass me by. Will I have those life long friends? Yes, because they never judge me, they accept any choices I make even if they do not agree with them, they keep me grounded and remind me of how far I have grown and they encourage me to become everything I can imagine myself becoming.



NOTE: I typed out the lyrics of the songs for quick reading, yet they do not hold the same impact unless listened to.

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Blake Webb 1986-2010




There are not enough world or number of tear to fall to express how deeply I miss you. You touched my life so deep I will never be able to forget you. Your life on this earth was short but you lived it to the fullest. I miss you but I will celebrate your life! Rest in Peace my dear friend Blake!

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

04.19.10- Java Man & Toys

what makes “Java Man” a successful research essay? Where does it lack in terms of research?

“Java Man” by Malcolm Gladwell makes a successful research essay because he gives a long time line of the history caffeine has played a role in the history of the world. The use of medical facts of how quickly caffeine can be metabolized into the body’s blood system, the amount of caffeine in a cup of coffee or tea and the ratio of concentration of caffeine to body weight determine how fast the effects of caffeine can leave the body’s system. He also brings up some interesting points of research when he talks about the idea of how caffeine helped develop the industrialized America- “caffeine gave workers enough energy to start work at a certain time and continue as long as necessary”.

He lacks in research by one, not give citations for the reader to look into if he or she became interested in a particular area of the paper’s ideas or facts. Secondly, he does give a broad range for a timeline on the life of caffeine in the world. He does not just focus on one particular product that has caffeine in it but relates other things. Gladwell gives more of a story of caffeine rather than a research essay.

What makes your selection (either “Tight Jeans” or “Toys”) a successful essay? Where does it lack in terms of research? How can this selection be altered to be more like “Java Man?” Where would you start?

The essay “Toys” by Ronald Barthes has a nice idea behind what he wanted to focus on- that “French toys literally prefigure the world of adult functions”. Barthes, I believe, wanted to show us the relationship of how toys are presupposing children to the adult world- the world of a career. Barthes lacks tremendously in the area of research. He writes more of a philosophical view on this paper instead of using facts and case studies to prove his idea. I would probably start with more of a psychological child brain growth aspect to start with my research to help prove the point Barthes makes on how simple wood blocks give the child the imagination to create anything the child wants. Then attempt to tie Barthes philosophical aspect and knowledge into it for some kick. Why not try and read something that is beyond the daily vocabulary of every day life, why not expand one’s self and thought.

I guess I it could be more like “Java Man” in the sense that it could tell more of a story along with the back ground knowledge and research done on the subject instead of making all the thoughts blur together. It could also bring up the thought of there being a creative side in the types of toys that usually teach you how to fit into a typical adult roll but maybe show the possibilites of that roll. They things the ways that one can create new things after one has already learne the basic steps to fit into society.

Thursday, April 8, 2010

a box of sand?

Once you are outside this sandbox you are free to come and go as you please. You cannot bring anything inside the box as proof of this outside world, but you can show the people inside that there are doors that lead to this world if they so choose to go through them. I chose to go explore these doors. I have been able to see over the walls of the sandbox and learn about this world. A world that allows me to analyze who I am, a world that can teach me things beyond the views of the Christian religion, a world that will not always judge me for thinking differently. I have found that philosophy had prepared me to be capable of opening these doors that lead outside, yet I remain living inside the sandbox. I know that I am close to finding the courage to step through the door and leave the sandbox but not today. I feel I am so close to becoming something that will put part of my soul at ease, even for a short time.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

03.23.10- College is a waste of time & money

Evidence for:
To keep their mammoth plants financially solvent, many institutions have begun to use hard-sell, Madison-Avenue techniques to attract students. They sell college like soap, promoting features they think students want: innovative programs, an environment conducive to meaningful personal relationships, and a curriculum so free it doesn’t sound like a college at all.”
- Ever since I started middle school, parents and teachers have been putting the focus on going to college right after high school. It started with the lower cost of tuition for me to go to community college for the first two years, along with the intrigue of being able to finally pick my own classes. The school giving names of classes like human sexuality, indoor soccer, and even more science based as astronomy gave me the illusion that it was going to be fun and enjoyable. What they don’t tell you is that half of the classes that are fun and enjoyable do not get you very far towards accumulating units/credits towards a particular major of study needed to get a diploma.

And if he had the brains to get into Princeton, he would be just as likely to make money without the four years spent on campus.”
- If you have the ability to get into such a prestigious school, then you must be capable of learning without being forces to study certain things that may or may not be helpful in life. Someone who is learns quickly and effectively can do apply it to jobs of that are only taught be actually doing them. Reading a so call “manual” may get you some basic knowledge of where things go and how they work, but until you actually have your hands on experience you really don’t know anything. Bird talks about how if you have the brains to go to Princeton then you can be capable of doing anything well that you want to learn such as the car mechanic and then knowing so much that can open door for someone to own there own business.

Evidence against:
This is the way it used to be with women, and just as society had systematically damaged women by insisting that their proper place was in the home, so we may be systematically damaging 18-year-olds by insisting that their proper place is in college.”
- I personally do not see how sending an eighteen year old to college could systematically damage them. How can some one be worse off by learning, even though it may be forced. It is true that not everyone one is built mentally for college but that is only a small percentage that is capable of being successful in the world without having schooling. To compare the way society thought women were better in the home to making an 18-year- old go to college is a bit extreme. To methodically make a women stay home and only do the choices of the house was hinder some to women; it did not let them live to the fullest potential. It did not allow them to explore different opportunities. Making a person go to college does the exact opposite. It gives them a wider range of knowledge, though sometimes it may be useless knowledge it is still knowledge nonetheless.

Jerry Darring of Indianapolis knows that it is to make a dollar. He worked with his farther in the family plumbing business, on the line at Chevrolet, and in the Chrysler foundry. He quit these jobs to enter Wright State University in Dayton, Ohio, because ‘in a job like that a person only has time to work, and after that he’s so tired that he can’t do anything else but come home and go to sleep’”.
- This evidence doesn’t seem to help her point of college being a waste of time. Jerry goes back because he finds a nine-to-five job so exhausting that he isn’t able to enjoy the rest of his life. Going back to school to find a job that will give him enjoyment rather than a high dollar sign paycheck. What is the point of making a lot of money if your to tired to even spend it in the end?

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

03.17.10- "Speak No Evil Day"

OUTLINE:
I. The goal of “Speak No Evil Day” is about bringing up the awareness of the negative impact words have on another human being.
A. the goal for a twenty-four hour period
B. the long-term goals
II. Although the ultimate goal- idea- is to get rid of all hurtful words, there may be circumstances that would allow for things of negative content to be said.
A. what words or context are permited
B. the types of person and their professions that are premitted to not fully comply with “Speak No Evil Day”.
III. The good that “Speak No Evil Day” could bring would be that not of fear, or distain for someone in your life, but for easy and joy for someone who rarely experiences this feeling.
A. the persons that could be helped with “Speak No Evil Day”
B. the people types of people the could possible change because of this day.

PARAGRAPH II:
“Speak no evil day” is supposed to be a day about eliminating hurtful, spiteful, and just plain mean words that are spoken to another human being. Yet, Tulshken want to allow journalist to report “relevant negative items” while he limits everyone else from saying, “disseminating rumors, particularly negative one”. How is one to determine who is allowed to talk bad about anyone else, even if they may or may not be true. They are still negative rumors. There is always some way to twist a scenario to make it relevant to one’s topic of discussion. Deserved criticism is apparently not allowed, although there are those instances where someone needs to be told that they are in the wrong; otherwise how will they ever know that some of their actions inflict pain on to another person. The idea of the golden rule: “speak about others with the same kindness and fairness that they wish others to exercise when speaking about them” is a more appropriate way to approach communicating with others. No one wants anyone to speak down to him or her, make them feel insignificant. Perhaps human beings should go into the criticism with a positive approach, offering good words about the person or there actions before pointing out something they might want to consider changing. No one can make another human change the way they speak to someone unless that person wants to see if they might be doing something wrong. There is always a way to alter one’s speech to inflict the least about of deterioration of someone’s emotional standings.

Sunday, February 28, 2010

03.02.10- College Pressures + 47 word sentence

47 word sentence

I am a sentence that likes to go ride bicycles while eating bananas, though I don’t know why I am restricted to only being forty-seven words because I want to be something more than a bicycle riding banana eating forty-seven word sentence that I’m told to be.

College Pressures

William Zinsser’s article College Pressures was a little had for me to start reading, one: that it was such a beautiful day and two: that the excerpts were a little annoying to read.
Beyond that I really enjoyed the article a lot. Though it was talking about the students at a Yale law school in the 1970’s I could relate. Today I wanted to just sit on the lawn soak in the sun and just listen to the sounds outside, yet I’m under the pressure to pass this English class. I am under pressure to do well. Either for the benefit of raising my GPA so that I can get better scholarships to help pay for this education that I need to get to do well in the world or simply to become “the best person I can be”. Either way there is ALWAYS pressure upon the modern day college student. We (I use “we” in that I am part of this whole experience) are taught that we must decide on a subject to focus our studies on so that we can get a degree in a particular field. This degree is supposed to get us started ahead of everyone else so that we don’t have to start at the bottom of the ladder. This degree is supposed to prove that we are knowledgeable in a particular field. That it makes us worth more.
The thing is that though the standards have changed, the standards that raise the competitiveness that we are brought up in to believe to be the best and you will be happy, that pressures Zinsser states are all in the same: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and even self-induced pressure.
The concept of “the Gentleman’s C”, is a glorious concept. And in theory it is the standard of passing. Getting the grade “C” is the minimum someone can learn while proving that they can be knowledgeable in the subject. If you car getting “Cs”, lets say in all of your classes and all your classes are supposed to be different subjects. Yet that isn’t the case anymore. All the classes one takes these days are related to the ultimate goal of that glorious degree. The gentleman’s C is supposed to make you well rounded, to be knowledgeable in all things of the world, from history, to arts, to philosophy, to science. I like this concept of the gentleman’s C. It takes the pressure out of trying to be the best.

Sunday, February 21, 2010

02.22.10: An Animals Place

I found Michael Pollan’s article “An Animal’s Place” very intriguing. He gave the idea of not eating meat or using animal products through an investigation and allowed the reader to come to their own conclusion.

He first started his article by explaining Peter Singers’ viewpoints in Animal Liberation. Singer argues that as humans we have a moral obligation for the rights as animals. Pollan goes on to say that philosophers, ethicists, law professors and activists are convinced that as humans need to treat animals as we treat ourselves. He even found a poll that claims that 51% of Americans believe that primates are entitled to the same rights as human children.

Our current society is inflicting more suffering on animals due to the increase in factory farms and slaughterhouses. We have disconnected with the animals we eat and use for experiment. How many of us actually know where our food comes from and how it is processed? Pollan’s view is that everyone would be a vegetarian if they visited a capitalist slaughterhouse.

The arguments that Pollan came up with are:
“Animals kill animals all the time. Why treat animals more ethically than they treat one another?” – Humans don’t need to kill other creatures in order to survive.

“Animals on factory farms do not know any other life.” – True but their suffering is the daily frustration of having their instincts controlled.

“Do animals feel pain?” – It’s argued that their pain is different than ours. What is really needed is the distinction between pain and suffering. Human and animals feel pain but do animals feel suffering?
Chickens cannibalize on one another when stuffed into cages; pigs chew each other’s tails off. These animals do not do this when raised in a natural setting.

So I understand that by looking at the way we raise and butcher our meat can determine how I feel about animal rights or as Pollen suggest “animal welfare”.

Pollan also took the extra step and found a small farm that raises its’ animals that way it was done before factory farming. Pigs are outdoors; chickens are in coops that release to the cattle grazed fields to forge for bugs. They slaughter their own chickens. They would slaughter their own pigs and cattle if the USDA would allow it. He looks after his animals, feeds them, cares for them and in return they provide eggs, mild and meat. Isn’t this how humans and animals have evolved?

I have found Pollan’s writing to be very effective in giving both either side of the spectrum on the views regarding animal rights. His arguments flow smoothly with his point of view backed up with research, experience and humor. His closing paragraph summed up the article with good advice. Maybe we should eat less meat and “with consciousness, ceremony and the respect they deserve.”

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

02.04.10: Gould-Darwin's Middle Road

“The idea of steering a course between undesirable extremes emerges as a central prescription for sensible life.”- An averaging between unpleasant alternatives, the golden mean of Aristotle.

Main Concept:
To build a theory comes about buy using both inductivism and eurekaism. Darwin did not come up with his theory of natural selection from his time on the Beagle. Darwin allowed his thoughts to go in many different directions after reading and researching for over a year and a half.

Inductivism: to study the facts with an unbiased option. Great scientists are most of all great observers and patient gatherers of information.
Eurekaism: allowing your powers of intuition to hit their maximum. It happens only to a few “persons of genius”. It can come out of nowhere, unexpected, random, and not explainable.

“The theory of natural selection arouse neither as a workmanlike induction from nature’s facts, nor as a mysterious bolt form Darwin’s subconscious, triggered by an accidental reading of Malthus.”

Howard E. Gruber’: Darwin on Man- traces all the false leads and turning points in the phase of Darwin’s life between when the Beagle gets home and Darwin coming to the conclusion of the natural selection theory.
- Gould could have talked more about this book, too support his “middle path” theory, thus the idea for the title of this article. Even though Darwin started his journey with unbiased mind, he did still have in the back of his mind the longing for answers. This leads to reading and re-reading, observing, and re-observing the same thing.

My Thoughts:
Gould could have simplified his idea of inductivism and eurekaism. It was hard for me to dissect really what he was getting at until he quoted Pasteur-
”fortune favors the prepared mind”.
These five simple words simplify inductivism and eurekaism to come to the culmination of a theory; you must have a plethora of information to draw from. You must observe everything you can, some may be drastic some may be very faint. After all you have gathered there will be some point in your life that all the pieces to a grander puzzle, that you never knew existed because you were not yet equipped with the necessary tools from the society that you live in to the places that you visit to the things that you have read or seen or listened to, will finally fit together.
“The sources of idea is one thing; its truth or fruitfulness is another.”

Sunday, January 31, 2010

choo choo!!


I think i can, I think can, I think i can...


get though this semseter
find a new path to travel down
over come my anxiety of writing

Friday, January 22, 2010

"Consider the Lobster" 01.26.10

Does The Main Lobster Festival really stir up ideas about weather or not a lobster feels pain?
- Festivals are meant to be a place where you enjoy Americana, food (cooked in all ways, shapes and forms), entertainment, and friends/ family. Festivals bring all shapes, sizes, colors of people together under a common fascination with in this case lobsters.

David Foster Wallace’s essay did provoke me. It asked me to “consider the lobster”. For me the matter of fact is that it is JUST A LOBSTER. It looks weird, with its abnormal structure, its prominent claws, and its antenna like eyeballs that stick out of its head. Yet I am a human, I like to eat protein (preferably from animals, though its possible to survive on protein from plants and such), and the lobster is a great source to do such that.

I gathered that David Foster Wallace’s essay was supposed to be about the Maine Lobster Festival for Gourmet magazine, yet someone he ended up going off on a tangent about how we need to consider the lobster, more in the act of actually killing it rather than eating it. I felt that the essay become preachy because if your are supposed to be writing an article for a food magazine you shouldn’t be going off on a tangent of whether or not the lobster feels pain or is suffering. He assumed that “everyone” who decides to go to the MLF, at some point in the time there, starts to think about the morality of killing the lobsters in the way we do.

Yes, the lobster that we have picked out for our meal that day probably does not want to die- but again what animal does want to die. Though with the fact that an animal no matter where on the chain of superiority most likely is “programmed” to not want to die, I highly doubt that they contemplate how not to die that day.
The lobster most likely does not think about where or not that this box filled with food will be at trap and eventually lead to my end. If that were so, they would have figured out by now.

I will just have to leave it with that David Foster Wallace is an unique writer in the sense that he does tend to voice his opinion of where a lobster can feel pain or not even if he did not realize it or not. He was effective enough to get me to “consider the lobster”, even though in the end I ended up siding with eating it no matter how it is cooked. They day that the lobster can out smart a human and start eating us, will be the day I pay respects to it and learn how to not get captured by it and begin a wonders game of whits.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Didion/Bizzle: 01.21.10

Remember the days that seemed to matter so much in that moment. Keep an account of the thoughts that consumed the brain for those seconds, minutes, days...

Didion:

Didion's journaling is meant to trigger part of the memory.
"Why did I write it down? In order to remember of course but exactly what was it I wanted to remember?"
Not so much a play by play but in the way a smell will remind you of a person. Not so much every detail but more so the feeling you get. Some times it works some times is dose not.
Its her perception of the things her body/mind experiences. Something was intended to be important to her.
“Sometimes even the maker has difficulty with the meaning.”

Buzzell:

Buzzell's blogging is easier, cheaper, and an outlet for the days that drag together in Iraq. Does he write in such focused sentences in his blogging so that he may not have to think about them later, so they do not drag on?
"Lesson" Don't be a f***ing idiot like me, and always look before you lie down anywhere, specially in this country."
Does he recount his days so he secures the memory in his mind, so that he learns from his mistakes so one day it might save his life?

Who's to say what is important? Someone can go though the same exact moment and come out with two completely different experiences- who's to say who is better?

My thoughts are short. I struggle for length. Texting is easy when there is no passion behind it. It’s easier to hide the emotions. I think in my head. Making thoughts to paper or keyboard stalls my brain. Growing up in the world of cell phones and Internet and social networks has numbed my brain. My brain hates to think. Very few things keep its creativeness engaged.

If I do write, I write in a journal. Its short. Few sentences, more questions to keep myself thinking. Some pictures if I find relevance. I write more freely about thoughts in my head after a beer or two. Though that can lead to drunken texts or emails and that is always bad, you send it, read it the next morning, and regret it. Journaling is safer. Less people see the hot mess of my thoughts.

“How it felt to me: that is getting closer to the truth about a notebook...” – Didion
So for what it’s worth the internet helps conceal some of the emotion that is bottled up in my head, it lets me talk when I want to, how I want to, with a sort of protective barrier. My journal is my own personal account of how I see “my world”, the world that I live in, the world that makes me who I am.